<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Letter of the Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moneyboxjunction.wordpress.com/the-letter-of-the-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moneyboxjunction.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Instant penalty charges for motorists - is the system fair?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:59:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shobhit</title>
		<link>http://moneyboxjunction.wordpress.com/the-letter-of-the-law/#comment-1823</link>
		<dc:creator>Shobhit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyboxjunction.wordpress.com/the-letter-of-the-law/#comment-1823</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeten,
Thanks for the tips and the encouragement. Will update tomorrow once I have seen the video footage.
Thanks
Shobhit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeten,<br />
Thanks for the tips and the encouragement. Will update tomorrow once I have seen the video footage.<br />
Thanks<br />
Shobhit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jiten</title>
		<link>http://moneyboxjunction.wordpress.com/the-letter-of-the-law/#comment-1821</link>
		<dc:creator>Jiten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyboxjunction.wordpress.com/the-letter-of-the-law/#comment-1821</guid>
		<description>Hi shobhit

Well I went to view my video footage and it seems to the guy invited me to view the footage commented that “it is too harsh, and it’s not fare” .

I did asked him about the new yellow box, and he replied “ sorry I can’t comment on the legality of that yellow box, but you can still appeal again and you might be lucky, you never know”.

I told him yes I am going to appeal again and ask for mercy, maybe it will work, don’t know why we have to bent our back end and pay, when it’s clearly seen on the cctv, there are no traffic, you can’t see my number plate as I stopped for 8 seconds and moved after the traffic light went green, then your camera operator takes a picture 15 seconds later when I am not on the yellow box and stopped at the traffic light.

Well he said no comment. I have appealed again on a compassionate ground, and see if they can waive this one off. 

When you view your cctv footage note the time, how long you are in the box, and establish the grounds for appeal, maybe you have not noticed the yellow box and kept on driving until you realised there is a stationary car infront of you,or you stopped because the car infront of you stopped suddenly,  also if you are not happy ask him to rewind then see the footage again, and again, and see the footage after you leave the box. As I have noticed that after the yellow box, you are still in a single lane filter from the bus lane, and there is a traffic light, which can cause anyone to be caught on the yellow box easily, as there are no warning sign. You will have 14 days to appeal after you view the cctv. I shall let you know the outcome of my case. Good luck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi shobhit</p>
<p>Well I went to view my video footage and it seems to the guy invited me to view the footage commented that “it is too harsh, and it’s not fare” .</p>
<p>I did asked him about the new yellow box, and he replied “ sorry I can’t comment on the legality of that yellow box, but you can still appeal again and you might be lucky, you never know”.</p>
<p>I told him yes I am going to appeal again and ask for mercy, maybe it will work, don’t know why we have to bent our back end and pay, when it’s clearly seen on the cctv, there are no traffic, you can’t see my number plate as I stopped for 8 seconds and moved after the traffic light went green, then your camera operator takes a picture 15 seconds later when I am not on the yellow box and stopped at the traffic light.</p>
<p>Well he said no comment. I have appealed again on a compassionate ground, and see if they can waive this one off. </p>
<p>When you view your cctv footage note the time, how long you are in the box, and establish the grounds for appeal, maybe you have not noticed the yellow box and kept on driving until you realised there is a stationary car infront of you,or you stopped because the car infront of you stopped suddenly,  also if you are not happy ask him to rewind then see the footage again, and again, and see the footage after you leave the box. As I have noticed that after the yellow box, you are still in a single lane filter from the bus lane, and there is a traffic light, which can cause anyone to be caught on the yellow box easily, as there are no warning sign. You will have 14 days to appeal after you view the cctv. I shall let you know the outcome of my case. Good luck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shobhit Narain</title>
		<link>http://moneyboxjunction.wordpress.com/the-letter-of-the-law/#comment-1819</link>
		<dc:creator>Shobhit Narain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyboxjunction.wordpress.com/the-letter-of-the-law/#comment-1819</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeten,
Apologies for a late response. I have checked several websites and all of them seem to say that atleast two edges of a yellow box should meet the kerb. In case of this greenford road yellow box none of the two edges touch the kerb,moreover as Chris mentioned there are no signs for traffic enforcement cameras- though there are signs for speed/bus lane cameras, I think we do have a case to fight for. I have to see my video evidence tomorrow. Is there anything in particular I should be aware of.
Rgds,
Shobhit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeten,<br />
Apologies for a late response. I have checked several websites and all of them seem to say that atleast two edges of a yellow box should meet the kerb. In case of this greenford road yellow box none of the two edges touch the kerb,moreover as Chris mentioned there are no signs for traffic enforcement cameras- though there are signs for speed/bus lane cameras, I think we do have a case to fight for. I have to see my video evidence tomorrow. Is there anything in particular I should be aware of.<br />
Rgds,<br />
Shobhit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://moneyboxjunction.wordpress.com/the-letter-of-the-law/#comment-1813</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyboxjunction.wordpress.com/the-letter-of-the-law/#comment-1813</guid>
		<description>Hi Jiten,

I am no expert but it sounds to me like you might have a case in respect of the car that suddenly stopped in front of you. Have a look at the penaltychargenotice.co.uk website they have some senarios being caught in a yellow box junction and judge whether you have a case from their info.
 Good Luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jiten,</p>
<p>I am no expert but it sounds to me like you might have a case in respect of the car that suddenly stopped in front of you. Have a look at the penaltychargenotice.co.uk website they have some senarios being caught in a yellow box junction and judge whether you have a case from their info.<br />
 Good Luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jiten Govind</title>
		<link>http://moneyboxjunction.wordpress.com/the-letter-of-the-law/#comment-1812</link>
		<dc:creator>Jiten Govind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyboxjunction.wordpress.com/the-letter-of-the-law/#comment-1812</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris, and Shobhit

I have also reveived a PCN on 3/9/09 greenford road/ otter road, now this PCN does not show my number plate as I stopped in emergency as the car infront of me stopped suddenly, and i was verly close to the car infront. now what they did is taken my number plate after i left the yellow box 15 seconds later from a different camera, I did appeal to view the cctv and they have given me date for 19/11/09. now i wanted to know if i have a case...i can send you the photos showing the time on two photos..i need to know if i have a case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris, and Shobhit</p>
<p>I have also reveived a PCN on 3/9/09 greenford road/ otter road, now this PCN does not show my number plate as I stopped in emergency as the car infront of me stopped suddenly, and i was verly close to the car infront. now what they did is taken my number plate after i left the yellow box 15 seconds later from a different camera, I did appeal to view the cctv and they have given me date for 19/11/09. now i wanted to know if i have a case&#8230;i can send you the photos showing the time on two photos..i need to know if i have a case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shobhit</title>
		<link>http://moneyboxjunction.wordpress.com/the-letter-of-the-law/#comment-1802</link>
		<dc:creator>Shobhit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyboxjunction.wordpress.com/the-letter-of-the-law/#comment-1802</guid>
		<description>Thanks Chris..Will give them same reason. I have asked the council to show mw video evidence. Still waiting for them to come back. Will send a recorded reminder to cover myself incase they say that a post has been sent. Will update on this board of any developments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Chris..Will give them same reason. I have asked the council to show mw video evidence. Still waiting for them to come back. Will send a recorded reminder to cover myself incase they say that a post has been sent. Will update on this board of any developments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Mills</title>
		<link>http://moneyboxjunction.wordpress.com/the-letter-of-the-law/#comment-1800</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Mills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyboxjunction.wordpress.com/the-letter-of-the-law/#comment-1800</guid>
		<description>Hi Shobhit,
I also contacted penaltychargenotice.co.uk about this junction and at first they sounded positive but later on when i received the rejection i was told to look at the adjudicators decisions or anything about the rules under the road markings and signs regulations to see if I had a case.  Unfortunately I decided to pay the reduced PCN but if I found anything dodgy about this junction i would try and get my money back later although I feel this would be more difficult. The only fault I can assume is that there is no traffic enforcement sign within 40 metres of this box only a speed camera sign. There are strict rules surrounding signs and regulations. It really needs someone to stand up to the council if you have legal support but this is not always a cheap alternative and time is not on our side. Nobody else has given any information about this box. Sometimes I use that road but I am absolutely paranoid now, I hate it.

Regards

C Mills</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Shobhit,<br />
I also contacted penaltychargenotice.co.uk about this junction and at first they sounded positive but later on when i received the rejection i was told to look at the adjudicators decisions or anything about the rules under the road markings and signs regulations to see if I had a case.  Unfortunately I decided to pay the reduced PCN but if I found anything dodgy about this junction i would try and get my money back later although I feel this would be more difficult. The only fault I can assume is that there is no traffic enforcement sign within 40 metres of this box only a speed camera sign. There are strict rules surrounding signs and regulations. It really needs someone to stand up to the council if you have legal support but this is not always a cheap alternative and time is not on our side. Nobody else has given any information about this box. Sometimes I use that road but I am absolutely paranoid now, I hate it.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>C Mills</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shobhit Narain</title>
		<link>http://moneyboxjunction.wordpress.com/the-letter-of-the-law/#comment-1799</link>
		<dc:creator>Shobhit Narain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyboxjunction.wordpress.com/the-letter-of-the-law/#comment-1799</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris, 
Have you received any response to this one. Even I received 2 PCNs for this yellow box. Even I believe if this doesn&#039;t comply with the traffic signs regulations. 
Would appreciate if you could please share any information.
Rgds,
Shobhit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,<br />
Have you received any response to this one. Even I received 2 PCNs for this yellow box. Even I believe if this doesn&#8217;t comply with the traffic signs regulations.<br />
Would appreciate if you could please share any information.<br />
Rgds,<br />
Shobhit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Mills</title>
		<link>http://moneyboxjunction.wordpress.com/the-letter-of-the-law/#comment-1790</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Mills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 18:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyboxjunction.wordpress.com/the-letter-of-the-law/#comment-1790</guid>
		<description>Hi I received a PCN from Ealing council as I was caught stationary in the yellow box junction at Greenford Rd and Otter Rd Ealing. I have replied with my representation to Ealing council stating that the junction doesn&#039;t comply with &#039;The Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2002&#039; as advised by a different website about PCN&#039;s. Ealing council rejected my representation on the grounds that &#039;the junction may look wrong but it complies with diagram. 1044 of the Regulations 2003. This is a new yellow box junction and I wonder if it is legal or not as I would have to pay the penalty in the next 10 days. Have I got a case?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi I received a PCN from Ealing council as I was caught stationary in the yellow box junction at Greenford Rd and Otter Rd Ealing. I have replied with my representation to Ealing council stating that the junction doesn&#8217;t comply with &#8216;The Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2002&#8242; as advised by a different website about PCN&#8217;s. Ealing council rejected my representation on the grounds that &#8216;the junction may look wrong but it complies with diagram. 1044 of the Regulations 2003. This is a new yellow box junction and I wonder if it is legal or not as I would have to pay the penalty in the next 10 days. Have I got a case?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PCN for entering and stopping in a box junction - The Consumer Forums</title>
		<link>http://moneyboxjunction.wordpress.com/the-letter-of-the-law/#comment-1740</link>
		<dc:creator>PCN for entering and stopping in a box junction - The Consumer Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyboxjunction.wordpress.com/the-letter-of-the-law/#comment-1740</guid>
		<description>[...] Re: PCN for entering and stopping in a box junction   Letter of the Law Money Box Junction [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Re: PCN for entering and stopping in a box junction   Letter of the Law Money Box Junction [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
